This is more a rant than anything else, and a bit removed from the discussion of hiking, and hiking clothes for women. Sure I would love to start a clothes company of my very own which might also have it’s personal “social mission” so to speak. Clothes companies objectives are earning profits by concentrating on women. In the method the majority of clothes corporations make the world worse for ladies. It is as whether it is an agenda in opposition to girls. Probably most women’s kinds are designed and conceptualized by males from the drawing board to the final sewing collectively of the apparel merchandise. The few ladies who are in the women’s clothing design business apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a pattern towards better clothing designs for women who want practicality, dignity and operate in their clothes. And that is where the dilemma is available in for loads of girls who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Ladies who just need practical, snug clothes are actually underrepresented . Certain, a lot of people would say “Not so. Since lots of low-rise or skin-tight jeans, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-length shorts, and tastelessly-quick skirts are the type of clothes that most likely nearly all of ladies purchase (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothes) , then it means these are the types that will continue to be manufactured and furthermore these sorts of “feminine styles” will make their manner into all forms of women’s clothes, even those which are alleged to be for operate not style. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches and so on. It isn't the only clothes firm that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates trend into operate. It brings us again to the place we began. As quite a couple of women who posted right here on “Hiking Lady” have said, they resort to men’s clothing for higher match, better comfort, higher freedom of motion and higher sturdiness. I would say that on the whole unisex sizing is one of the best method to go with some options that will help accommodate individuals who may need a bit extra hip or belly (each men and women). Nearly all of women’s “active wear” just don’t have it. ’s clothing. Men’s sizes are larger even when it comes to “small” sizes for males. I doubt that is not possible. Usually, girls can fit into men’s clothes this manner. The scrubs have been supplied by the facility. I lately was working in a research facility and was required to put on scrubs. I informed her that on the subject of scrubs, a size small pant does not fit me and it's unusual because most small-measurement men’s pants fit me. The availability person stated she thought a measurement small would match me. The supply individual stated that it's as a result of ladies have hips and males don’t. I advised her that plainly quite a lot of small-sized men would find it onerous to fit in most small-sized scrubs too. What a lot of people appear to forget is that some men do have pretty-outstanding hips and the majority of men’s clothes are meant for men with completely straight hips. Actually when men get older, in their 40s they very often develop larger hips. Years ago, I recall a radio commercial for a special form of Levis denims which were meant for older men and it was mentioned that the features had extra room in the hip and thigh. Yet men have a better deal in terms of clothes. Women’s clothing is always made to incorporate vogue fairly than operate. EMS and REI and Sierra Buying and selling Put up, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Information, and various other such stores, or on-line shops have a few of the better forms of clothing meant for hiking and different out of doors actions. Manufacturers resembling Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and various others. These manufacturers are inclined to have the very best materials, and one of the best features. They've the perfect mix of fabrics in order to be lightweight as doable for hot days and which might protect in chilly days without loads of bulk. They tend to have SPF inbuilt to guard the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to use a big measurement to have room for my shoulders and arms however then the a part of the jacket that was under the waist bellowed out and just was uncomfortable to put on and simply had a very awkward look to it. But, I've seen such absurdly-minimize jackets for women by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to enhance the female kind whereas being “useful” for out of doors activity, or that is what the designers had in thoughts and yet I must surprise what they were considering by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and limiting once i moved. I don’t know how it ever got manufactured and probably hundreds have been made and it appeared to be a waste of time and materials and it seemed as if the “quality control people” missed some major design flaws. I wish I wrote down the type number in order that perhaps I could find a hyperlink to it within the web and perhaps you all can see for your self. There are other women’s lively put on that is probably not as excessive but which still have sufficient lack of perform so that almost all lively women simply cannot use them. The Hole and Old Navy usually are not significantly for energetic wear however they have small line of such clothing. I think that they are terrible in materials and design. The Gap, Previous Navy, Modell’s, Target, Ok-Mart and different such stores, basically only have clothes fabricated from cotton ( with a few exceptions). Modell’s is presupposed to be a “sports store” nevertheless it carries exercise clothes for women which is made by Nike, Addidas (etc) and although these are well-known brand names, I find that they actually put too much fashion into clothing at the expense of operate. They went out of business years in the past however they also had clothing for ladies that I found to be impractically designed. In New York City where I reside there is one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-well-recognized store in decrease Manhattan which sells all sorts of outside/camping/hiking equipment and clothes. There was a store in NYC called Herman’s and another called Robbin’s. Far from it. I've seen girls in these shops speaking to gross sales associates and saying that they have looked in all places for extra practical designs . There may be an organization that quite a lot of you probably have heard of referred to as “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s lively wear. There are various Modell’s and one Sports Authority, and some Old Navy’s and It would seem that there are quite a lot of stores that will have something for each girl. Guess what? It doesn’t work. Nearly all of their styles are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” whereas playing sports or engaging in rugged out of doors actions. Why do I all the time discover that the clothes that come the closest to being practical and rugged and sensible are those which can be discontinued and replaced by those that aren’t? Their women’s bathing suits are actually ineffective. They're meant for ladies who've perfect figures , even who're skilled models and the bathing fits are sexist for my part. They could continue a sure fashion for several seasons or they might substitute the model and never revive it. Why should any bathing suit be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the highest be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had sure kinds of designs called “Grab and Go” that means that the clothes are so virtually designed you can just seize them, throw them on, and walk out the door to train or do the rest. Are you going to go swimming or surfing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I wish that it was as marketed to be. All through my life I've gone from retailer to retailer during sure times of the year looking for the best rugged and functional clothes for winter or summer time. It's always laborious to search out something close to what I want. It often goes for footwear and slippers and other footwear too. I typically must take no matter comes closest and that is normally in the men’s section. There are designs which I'll go to my grave scratching my head over concerning why they had been made the way they were.. I once found some snug slip-ons made by Teva. But the absurd factor was that the soles were designed with pretty-deep grooves that had been very closely spaced they usually had been all over the sole . Just why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They're the primary piece of clothes that will probably be touching the ground and going by all sorts of disgusting stuff. I have had a fantasy of designing shoes which are meant to be cleaned and are easy to scrub. I can’t for the life of me perceive why such a design was made. To allow climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and but it does not work on any sort of foot put on like it really works on a Jeep’s tires. I do know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothes producer seen this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (and so forth) get stuck in the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the constant and intense rolling of the tires signifies that a lot of the debris will likely be hurled off. No human can create that type of bodily pressure to continually drive the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The best way that the grooves are designed it solely makes the soles laborious to clean. It signifies that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots might be stuffed up with debris and wouldn't help much in serving to the wearer to successfully climb; that is that if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are literally meant to allow the wearer to climb. It seems to me that if the soles are made of rubber there isn’t a need for such elaborately designed grooves that only collect dirt. I ponder why there aren’t chemists and clothes technicians working on a greater type of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips better on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking sneakers are used, and it would make it pointless to make grooves on the soles of footwear. I have observed some unusual designs that do not contribute to operate. It seems to me that grooves are simply placed on the soles of shoes for fashion purposes. This goes for sneakers too. A lot of sneakers which could be good in design in different ways, have very impractically designed soles. As far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and different such kinds of pants, there are those which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are those with drawstrings. After all I'm not an skilled in making footwear or shoe-soles and i could be mistaken , but I'm enough of an professional in sporting footwear meant for active lifestyles and I believe that a variety of shoe manufacturers are focusing on the improper factor. I ponder why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it unnecessary . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made so that the drawstring is stitched into the again of the pants waist area. I hate anything with a drawstring waist. I think it makes the drawstring much less effective and it defeats the purpose of the drawstring. Underwear: I have been in stores equivalent to Ok-Mart and Goal where there are a big variety of women’s underwear. It is tough to find the form of briefs that almost all of our grandmothers used to wear, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible in my opinion. I want comfort, durability and simple-care. All that doesn't converse for me. Anything that gets stuck you-know-the place is unacceptable. I've been within the underwear section of shops and different stores (I must admit I never regarded in Victoria’s Secret but I don’t anticipate to search out anything practical there), and I've seen older women looking for one thing that is age-acceptable and dignified and , again, practical. There's little other than these hello-cuts. See one of many hyperlinks below for an article concerning the history of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” are usually not modest sufficient. It appears it has at all times been about physically limiting women. That’s the way in which I have a look at it. Additionally one of many hyperlinks under lead to an article about how there shall be a women’s like of clothes which can be inspired by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It signifies that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I have found to what I prefer is a sure Jockey model transient “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the higher kind of design to get. Elastic that's merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be less rugged and the stitching can come undone more easily . I need to order a dimension larger than I usually would so that the waist wouldn't be too tight. One major flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t understand the actual purpose of “athletic bras” the way in which they are designed. I positive don’t care about “standing out.” ( I really don’t in any case, and i don’t care). Bras meant for active lifestyles should hold them in, nothing extra. I have heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I have seen some feminine runners who seem like prime heavy and still they are very fast however I'm wondering if they will develop again problems later in life. I do know that I is probably not addressing the needs of women born with certain sizes, or who've particular needs resembling after surgical procedure, however sport bras should be made to have enough comfortable tension to stop bouncing. There is a need for bras that do what some jock straps are imagined to do. I would like to design shirts and vests with tension constructed into the suitable space that will make bras pointless. It could be great for warmer weather and for simplicity, so that you don’t must trouble with attaching a bra after which a shirt. Just keep “them” from shifting. Simply slip into your shirt (and other clothes ) and you'll go out to walk , jog or no matter. Why isn’t there such a factor? I feel I mentioned in one among my previous posts that Coolibar had a reasonably good pant for ladies known as Solar Pant. I am certain a whole lot of girls would need such forms of clothing. I then installed an elastic band to offer extra tension because the waist band could be a bit too giant in any other case, and the pant is virtually a dream. I did have to change the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which involved reducing into the back of the waistband area since the drawstring was sewn into that space. It is vitally sensible for lots of actions. It's not so lengthy that the hem drags on the floor. It isn't for very highly regarded weather but that can depend on your own capacity to tolerate scorching weather. It is of a cloth blend that isn't like cotton. All pants should have pockets, but generally the way in which the pockets are designed make them useless anyway. I discover it's a really particular person thing. This is how most hiking pants should be designed. It's a teensy bit too dense for sports bra legging set highly regarded weather very very like the unique Coolibar Sun Pant. It is supposed to be used with a belt but I discover that I don’t need one to wear this pant. I found a pant on Cabela’s that is for males, however which matches well and it is named “The utility Pant” (see one of the last two links below). It stretches a bit so it does not get tight if you bend or move. In fact not everybody has the identical determine as I achieve this others might have a different opinion. But usually this is a good kind of pant . In the event you do prefer it you should write to the company and tell them to hold on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the entrance pockets are designed so as the openings are slits almost completely parallel with the waist. I feel they will discontinue it so you may want to present it a attempt. The material stretches so it is not as bad as if it have been with denims with these kinds of pockets. It is an impractical design and that i don’t know why clothing designers make pant pockets like this. With these sorts of pockets it's important to maneuver your palms in a extra unnatural way and even elevate the hem of your shirt to put your arms in your front pants pockets. It has to be for fashion, nothing else. Pockets should be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is good too. It's a good idea to have zippered pockets. Anyone who has ever gotten his/her open pocket stuck on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike while passing by too close will know what I mean. But sometimes zippers could cause scrapes to the back of the hand when you set your hands in. There is a must design zippers of non-scraping material for this objective. There is also one other men’s pant from Columbia. I believe I discussed them earlier than (see considered one of the 2 links below). Why aren’t any clothes designers working on this? They're of a great material for hot days, but for me, I discovered myself removing the belt and sewing an elastic band within the back of the waistband space so as to make the belt pointless. I experience a bike. I rarely use shorts even when i jog. However again, I should settle for no matter comes close to what I need. I came across a working brief known as Brooks Sherpa IV. I have a tendency to just go to clothes shops to take a look at designs and supplies . What I did like about it was the lightweight materials. I simply wondered why common long pants are usually not fabricated from such a material. It would be wonderful for a hiking pant meant for very popular weather. The material was very much like a very very lightweight softshell. There is one from the North Face called The Prolix jacket. I like softshell clothes. It is rather lightweight, not excellent for cold weather by itself but you'll be able to put layering underneath it. It is flexible and matches excellently and permits freedom of motion. But softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer time. Also , why aren’t there any actually actually practically-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make a great summertime softshell. There needs to be a vest for traveling. I find myself wishing for such a factor. It does not exist. Why not make one among lightweight and stretchy materials? I know that I have said to much on this put up. I will stop for now. I hope I didn't bore anyone. I have a variety of concepts for the better design of clothes and I will probably put up once more with my concepts until I am instructed not to. I could have been a bit political too.
